BLADE Reboot Star Mia Goth Sued For Allegedly Kicking An Actor In The Head While Filming MAXXXINE

BLADE Reboot Star Mia Goth Sued For Allegedly Kicking An Actor In The Head While Filming MAXXXINE BLADE Reboot Star Mia Goth Sued For Allegedly Kicking An Actor In The Head While Filming MAXXXINE

Mia Goth, who is reportedly set to play the villain in Marvel Studios' Blade, is being sued by a background actor she worked with on A24's upcoming horror sequel, MaXXXine...

By MarkCassidy - Jan 14, 2024 09:01 AM EST
Filed Under: Blade
Source: Via FearHQ

Actress Mia Goth, who is reportedly set to play Lilith in Marvel Studios' Blade reboot, is being sued by a background actor she worked with on A24's upcoming horror sequel, MaXXXine.

Goth has been accused of deliberately kicking James Hunter in the head while filming a scene... and then taunting him about it afterwards!

In the lawsuit, Hunter states that he was hired for three days of work to play the role of “Dead Parishioner” in the movie, which takes place years after the events of Ti West's X.

On the first night of shooting, Hunter says he was asked to lay on the ground for several hours covered in fake blood, “enduring ants and mosquitoes." In the scene in question, Goth was supposed to run past him without making contact, but after she "almost stepped on him" during the fourth take, Hunter is said to have complained to the second assistant director.

On the next take, the suit alleges that Goth deliberately kicked him in the head with her boot, then followed him into the bathroom and “taunted, mocked and belittled” him, daring him to do anything about it.

Hunter also alleges that the fake blood and robe required for the scene were "painful to peel off," and due to the then-undiagnosed concussion, he “nearly passed out twice” prior to leaving the set. He later sought private medical attention.

The actor claims to have suffered a concussion after initially feeling light-headed on his drive home and had to pull over twice. The next day, the casting agency informed him that the production no longer required his services for the remaining two days he was originally hired for.

The suit accuses Goth of battery and also includes a wrongful termination claim against A24, Goth and West.

Goth's representatives have not responded, but we'll be sure to keep you updates as more details on this situation come to light.

"MaXXXine is an upcoming American slasher film written and directed by Ti West. It is the final installment of the X trilogy, following X and Pearl. The film stars Mia Goth, who reprises her role as Maxine (and also serves as producer), alongside Elizabeth Debicki, Moses Sumney, Michelle Monaghan, Bobby Cannavale, Lily Collins, Halsey, Giancarlo Esposito, and Kevin Bacon. In the film, as the only survivor of a massacre, Maxine sets out for fame and success in 1980s Los Angeles."

The movie does not have an official release date.

Michael B. Jordan Channels BLADE In First BTS Look At Ryan Coogler's Untitled Vampire Movie
Related:

Michael B. Jordan Channels BLADE In First BTS Look At Ryan Coogler's Untitled Vampire Movie

RUMOR: Wesley Snipes Set To Return As BLADE In The Marvel Cinematic Universe
Recommended For You:

RUMOR: Wesley Snipes Set To Return As BLADE In The Marvel Cinematic Universe

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Kadara
Kadara - 1/14/2024, 9:44 AM
He sounds like a loser, can't wait for the judge's ruling.
Murderisbadong
Murderisbadong - 1/14/2024, 9:52 AM
@Kadara - Yea. Getting kicked in the head and dealing with a concussion makes you such a loser..

/S

You people are losers.
Kadara
Kadara - 1/14/2024, 10:17 AM
@Murderisbadong - Allegedly. He could've just as easily been kicked out of the movie and decided to whine like a little bitch.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 1/14/2024, 10:30 AM
@Kadara - You know why we say 'Innocent before proven guilty'? It's so that we don't put too much on a potentially innocent person, because that would be a bad thing to do.

But in the potential victims case, that would be an even worse thing to do.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 1/14/2024, 10:42 AM
@Kadara - can you intelligently explain why he "sounds like a loser?" Or are you just being an online d1ck just to troll?
bobevanz
bobevanz - 1/14/2024, 10:58 AM
@Kadara - this is easy marketing for her upcoming movie lol
regularmovieguy
regularmovieguy - 1/14/2024, 9:48 AM
Wouldn’t surprise me at all if Mia Goth is batshit crazy. She has a child with Shia LaBeouf.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 1/14/2024, 9:55 AM
The guy's name is James...

JustAWaffle
JustAWaffle - 1/14/2024, 1:49 PM
@MarkCassidy - ….his name was James….
Murderisbadong
Murderisbadong - 1/14/2024, 9:57 AM
She should treated like any other actor would have been in the situation. Fired… kicked him and then followed him into the bathroom to harass him and then the very next day he gets fired. Sounds like she got him fired.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 1/14/2024, 10:44 AM
@Murderisbadong - Followed him to the bathroom?

He should of also sued her for stalking and sexual harassment. Might as well get as much on as possible so a couple charges stick.
WhatIfRickJames
WhatIfRickJames - 1/14/2024, 9:59 AM
Interested in seeing the evidence. Feels a little fishy to me…
KaptainKhaos
KaptainKhaos - 1/14/2024, 10:08 AM
Some men (including myself) would pay good money for what he got for free
S8R8M
S8R8M - 1/14/2024, 10:12 AM
@KaptainKhaos - Which head are you talking? Haha.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 1/14/2024, 10:28 AM
@S8R8M - I wonder if she was wearing goth boots. If you're name was Mia Goth, you'd probably wanna stay on brand. If it was goth boots, I wouldn't want to be consensually kicked in either head
S8R8M
S8R8M - 1/14/2024, 10:48 AM
@ObserverIO - Again. It all depends which head she steps on.
Some guys like their crotch stamped on haha.
SpiderParker
SpiderParker - 1/14/2024, 10:13 AM
Waiting for @ClintThaHamster to see how he paints this as a fault of the guy.
clintthahamster
clintthahamster - 1/16/2024, 7:42 AM
@SpiderParker - If the incidents occurred as described, then Goth is a bully and a sociopath and has no place on a film set. But you certainly can't rule out that the accuser is making this up because he wants fame, recognition, or money, right? Isn't that how this works?
SpiderParker
SpiderParker - 1/16/2024, 9:28 AM
@ClintThaHamster - Incidents never occurs as described but since this is a professional incident and not a personal/emotional one, the possibility of it being a lie, at the risk of causing damage to professional self, is low. Ofcourse, there could be more to it as is the case all the time.

But, who do you stand with? The supposed bully with too much power? The accuser who wants justice/revenge? The man who supposedly got abused? Or the woman who supposedly abused? Surely, you are not gonna stand with the man for obvious reasons.
clintthahamster
clintthahamster - 1/16/2024, 9:41 AM
@SpiderParker - I'm not some brainwashed dink, incapable of critical thought. You said before that women are just as likely, if not more likely, to be abusers as men are, and that is simply demonstrably false. That doesn't mean that women don't suffer from mental illness, or act out previous patterns of abuse on their partner, or do unsafe things in the workplace.

In this instance, a person with lower status in the workplace is accusing a person with higher status of abusing their power, or possibly just flat out being abusive. That's concerning and deserves to be investigated, just as it would be if it involved two women, two men, or a woman accusing a man of the same behavior.
SpiderParker
SpiderParker - 1/16/2024, 10:58 AM
@ClintThaHamster - Ah, I never said women are more likely to be abusers. But even a women of lower status has higher power than a man in the eyes of the law. Doesn't matter if she is guilty or not, she can easily throw the man under the bus and walk free.

And even if Mia is really innocent, its already too late for her to fight fair as the minds been made up as thats the power of being an accuser.

Contrary to popular belief, law and justice doesn't matter much. In a fair fight, the accuser wins. In a unfair fight, the woman wins. Guess who wins when the accuser is a women who is fighting dirty and the defendant is a black man. Meanwhile, it doesn't even matter which side the truth sits on.
clintthahamster
clintthahamster - 1/16/2024, 11:46 AM
@SpiderParker - "I never said women are more likely to be abusers."

You said that it was impossible to prove that men perpetrate abuse more than women using statistical methods, and that men and women are evenly split, 50/50, when it comes to a "scale of evil deeds." I figured it was safe to infer that you, at the very least, weren't certain that men were more likely to be abusers than women.

As for the rest of your comment . . . Yes, the justice system is broken in America, and yes, black men have a much harder time as a result. But if you're saying that any case where a woman is vindicated is somehow suspect, I believe that betrays some underlying prejudices of your own.
SpiderParker
SpiderParker - 1/16/2024, 1:13 PM
@ClintThaHamster - I agree to a 50/50. I agree to women getting better treatment in some cases specially if its alleged abuse. I never said every time woman is vindicated, she is somehow a suspect but women do often abuse the system but as do rich people. Its a game of rock, paper, scissors. Woman can abuse a innocent man but then the same woman can be abused by a rich man yet that rich man could be abused by another crazy but sympathetic woman, vice versa and so on. That is the circle.
clintthahamster
clintthahamster - 1/16/2024, 1:49 PM
@SpiderParker - All of the things you are saying are possible (if not equally probable) but cycle you describe simply doesn't exist. Victims of intimate partner abuse rarely go on to become abusers themselves.

That said, I have no doubt that many-to-most abusers have a history of abuse as a child, mental health issues, and/or substance abuse issues, and that the criminal justice system is inapt at handling such issues when compared to social work, mental healthcare, and restorative justice.
SpiderParker
SpiderParker - 1/16/2024, 4:36 PM
@ClintThaHamster - If that gave the indication that I meant this would turn into a cycle which very well might be true, but well my bad as that was only figuratively speaking. I only meant a in one case a rich man can get away with abusing someone but then in another even a rich man can get abused and the woman can get away with it only through innocent looking charm and wit. Movie stars are not the only actors. Even with evidence, it is hard to be certain about someone's guilt or innocence especially if either party is rich, famous with something to lose and/or gain.
clintthahamster
clintthahamster - 1/16/2024, 4:46 PM
@SpiderParker - Agreed 100% that the US criminal and civil justice systems favor the wealthy.
SpiderParker
SpiderParker - 1/16/2024, 4:56 PM
@ClintThaHamster - Yes but again you missed the point, it also favors women. So, the preconception for either is pretty wrong attitude. Its never that simple.
clintthahamster
clintthahamster - 1/17/2024, 7:56 AM
@SpiderParker - "it also favors women."

Gonna need some evidence for that claim. I did some googling myself, and all I could find that came close to substantiating it were unsourced articles on the websites of lawyers trying to gin up business.
SpiderParker
SpiderParker - 1/17/2024, 8:05 AM
@ClintThaHamster - Idk man, just imagine a black guy trying to force his white GF to give up her phone and when she grabs it out oh his hand and causes scratch marks on him during the altercation and runs away, the black guy chases her through the street for god knows how long then he breaks into her apartment and passes out while drunk. The white woman comes back, she calls the cops, who do you think is facing the charges? I can bet you, it wont be simple misdemeanor charges on the woman.
clintthahamster
clintthahamster - 1/17/2024, 8:20 AM
@SpiderParker - Factoring race in, yes, a black man will probably fair worse in court than any white person. But "I don't know, imagine this" is not evidence. It's you expressing your assumptions about the world. All I'm saying is, challenge those assumptions.

I will say, in my googling around, I saw some articles that male victims of DV have a harder time getting police and the courts to take them seriously. Is that what you're talking about? Because that's likely true, but has nothing to do with women and everything to do with toxic masculinity and deeply rooted prejudices in the legal system.
SpiderParker
SpiderParker - 1/17/2024, 9:31 AM
@ClintThaHamster - So, it has nothing to do with women being taken more seriously being the reason men are taken less seriously in law? Surely, that must also mean, when women are taken less seriously in corporate and political world, it is not cause of men being taken more seriously? Or did I just pop your double standard bubble?

There's no point going further than this, I have laid out my point, people who are willing to understand can't ignore such a juxtaposition.
clintthahamster
clintthahamster - 1/17/2024, 9:47 AM
@SpiderParker - "So, it has nothing to do with women being taken more seriously being the reason men are taken less seriously in law? Surely, that must also mean, when women are taken less seriously in corporate and political world, it is not cause of men being taken more seriously?"

Comparing corporate or political representation to legal outcomes isn't relevant, it's an apples and oranges comparison. There are a finite number of top positions in corporations or in politics, so if a man holds a particular position, a woman cannot, and vice versa. In the case of DV proceedings, on the other hand, each instance stands alone. A man being abused doesn't prevent a woman from being abused, and vice versa.

The truth is, neither men nor women are taken seriously enough in domestic violence proceedings. It is also true that men are taken less seriously, and also that men are less likely to report DV, as it is viewed as "unmanly" to have been a victim of such an attack. There's also a non-zero amount of DV claims lodged by men that result in there being more evidence that the man was the abuser, and that he is vindictively filing a claim over defensive wounds. All kinds of factors to consider.

"There's no point going further than this"

Hey, man, you tagged me in. I was happy to never talk about this shit with you ever again.
SpiderParker
SpiderParker - 1/17/2024, 10:01 AM
@ClintThaHamster - It not really a apple and orange situation as one person being taken more seriously will result in the other person being taken less seriously. It is that simple. Its the preconception of it that leads to both situations being inequal. That a man is violent yet reliable. And a women is innocent yet unreliable.

It is more like the world has come to believe, that if something is done, it is done by a man. If a house is built, done by a man. If a plane is built, done by a man. If a time machine is built, done by a man. If the world is destroyed, done by a man. Even violence is something you are proud about that man is winning at it deep down. You know what toxic masculinity is about? Saying things like women can't possibly be violent as it is a man's job too. Don't gaze into the abyss too long, the abyss also gazes back at you.
clintthahamster
clintthahamster - 1/17/2024, 10:51 AM
@SpiderParker - "That a man is violent yet reliable. And a women is innocent yet unreliable."

This doesn't make any sense. Who thinks this? This is not a common preconceived notion.

"If a house is built, done by a man. If a plane is built, done by a man. If a time machine is built, done by a man. If the world is destroyed, done by a man. Even violence is something you are proud about that man is winning at it deep down."

Whaaaaat are you talking about? These are not my beliefs. You're projecting.

"You know what toxic masculinity is about? Saying things like women can't possibly be violent as it is a man's job too"

Saying that men are more likely to commit violent crimes than women doesn't mean that women aren't CAPABLE of such things, only that they don't do them as often, which is factually true. Toxic Masculinity is the societal framework that expects men to be more violent, not the belief that they are. You're simply incorrect there.
SpiderParker
SpiderParker - 1/17/2024, 11:45 AM
ClintThaHamster - Seems to me that it is a preconceived notion considering any in this time, any important desicion needs to be from a man. Which presents man to be reliable. Hence, making the other party less so in comparison.

I'm not projecting, if for a second you misunderstood me for someone who believes in patriarchy, you are sorely wrong. But I don't believe in matriarchy either.

You see things like left or right, good or evil, communism or capitalism. I don't. There's a middle way to everything and the ones on the either extremes are the ones [frick]ing up the whole world.
clintthahamster
clintthahamster - 1/17/2024, 12:06 PM
@SpiderParker - "if for a second you misunderstood me for someone who believes in patriarchy, you are sorely wrong. But I don't believe in matriarchy either."

But only one of these things is a reality. You don't need to expend any energy fighting a repressive matriarchy that does not exist, and never has.

"You see things like left or right, good or evil, communism or capitalism."

Yes, I live in the real world, where ideas compete for prominence in the real world. I join you in hoping for a middle path, but that doesn't mean we don't have an obligation to fight the extremes that exist RIGHT NOW.

For example, I'm not a communist, but I believe that unchecked capitalism is a major issue. I'm not an anarchist, but I oppose aspiring autocrats. I don't believe that women should hold the vast majority of power, but that doesn't mean that I should accept the status quo of men holding the vast majority of power.

If you believe in a middle path, the only way to get there is to push against the status quo, which is going to look an awful lot like taking the opposite position.
SpiderParker
SpiderParker - 1/17/2024, 2:26 PM
@ClintThaHamster - Which gets us no where. It brings us exactly where we began. You fight against patriarchy and you bring about matriarchy, you fight against communism and you bring capitalism. Slowly and surely, you become what you fought against. A tyrannical power that used to fight the other tyrannical power and won. Fight for equality is important not fighting against XYZ. Fighting FOR not AGAINST.

The kind of mindset you have right now is the kind of mindset people who brought this status quo had. If you keep fighting an extreme, you will just shift that extreme to the other side. The battle is supposed to be fought at the middle and against both extremes.
clintthahamster
clintthahamster - 1/17/2024, 2:49 PM
@SpiderParker - "Fight for equality is important not fighting against XYZ"

This is semantics. If you want the consensus to be in the middle, you can't just hope that a bunch of moderate centrists will take over. You need a coalition of like-minded individuals from across the political spectrum to move the Overton window in the right (which is to say, Left) direction.

"The battle is supposed to be fought at the middle and against both extremes."

Cool, but right now, the US Government is mostly controlled by the far right, and the centrists aren't doing shit, because they get paid (by the gov't and by corporate donors) regardless. It takes people fighting for REAL change, but willing to compromise, to get where you want to go.
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder